Contributed articles
Pitch a useful argument
Proposals should give readers a defensible framework, firsthand operating knowledge, a technical explanation, or a careful analysis that is not already available in our guides.
Contribute evidence and expertise
Help make the record more useful.
We welcome article proposals, primary-source evidence, corrections, and technically relevant citation suggestions from researchers, operators, builders, buyers, and domain experts.
Send a proposal →Sources and corrections
Strengthen an existing record
Send customer statements, filings, technical reports, repositories, evaluation details, or corrections that materially change how a claim should be classified.
Citation suggestions
Relevant links are reviewed on merit
You may suggest a source that directly supports or corrects a specific passage. Explain the claim it supports and why it is more authoritative than the current source.
Industry expertise
Share experience with boundaries
Operators and builders can propose interviews or contributed analysis. Disclose employment, funding, customer, investment, and other material relationships.
What we look for
Specific, sourced, and useful
- • A clear question or argument for the intended reader
- • Primary sources and links that readers can inspect
- • Explicit limits, uncertainty, and contrary evidence
- • Original expertise or analysis rather than promotional copy
- • Disclosure of relevant commercial relationships
Link policy
No paid links or guaranteed placement
Physical AI Guide does not sell backlinks, exchange links for ranking purposes, or guarantee that a submitted URL will be added. Links are included only when they help readers verify a claim, inspect an artifact, or continue to a relevant primary source.
We may decline promotional guest posts, mass outreach, undisclosed paid placements, affiliate pitches, and submissions whose main purpose is search manipulation.
Editorial process
Acceptance is not automatic
- 1. Proposal reviewWe assess fit, usefulness, conflicts, and source quality.
- 2. Evidence reviewMaterial claims must remain attached to inspectable evidence.
- 3. Editorial revisionAccepted work may be edited for clarity, structure, sourcing, and scope.
- 4. Transparent creditPublished contributions identify the author, affiliation, and relevant disclosures.
Submission does not guarantee review, publication, timing, wording, or a link. Contributors retain responsibility for the accuracy and originality of material they provide.
Contact the editorial team
Send enough detail to evaluate the idea.
For article proposals, include a working title, thesis, reader, outline, relevant experience, sources, and disclosure. For a citation or correction, identify the exact page and claim.